🔥 Gate 廣場活動:#发帖赢代币NIGHT 🔥
發佈任意與 NIGHT 相關內容即可參與!
觀點分享、行情分析、參與體驗、投研筆記通通都算有效參與。
📅 啟用時間:2025/12/10 16:00 - 12/21 24:00(UTC+8)
📌 參與方式
1️⃣ 在 Gate 廣場發帖(文字 / 圖文 / 分析 / 觀點均可)
2️⃣ 帖子需添加話題 #发帖赢代币NIGHT 或 #PostToWinNIGHT
🏆 獎勵設置(總計 1,000 NIGHT)
🥇 Top 1:200 NIGHT
🥈 Top 4:100 NIGHT / 人
🥉 Top 10:40 NIGHT / 人
📄 注意事項
內容需原創,不得抄襲或灌水
獲獎者需完成 Gate 廣場身份認證
Gate 對活動擁有最終解釋權
Ethereum’s Potential ‘Supreme Court’ Could Secure the Network’s Future
The Ethereum blockchain network has always been a go-to platform for new players to launch their projects and enter the crypto space. In an exciting proposal, Matter Labs co-founder and CEO Alex Gluchowski talks about having an Ethereum court , which will have a similar hierarchical court as in the real world.
In a Twitter post last Saturday, September 2, floated this idea of having an “Ethereum Supreme Court”. He added that this would be similar to the United States Supreme Court, and would be the final stop for parties to dispute the smart contracts issue. Alex Gluchowski stated that this would serve as an intermediary instead of always taking matters to the traditional court or lawyer. Gluchowski stated;
In Gluchowski’s vision, conflicts and urgent updates would be managed through a tiered structure of on-chain courts. The ultimate authority, however, would be an Ethereum layer-1 soft fork, functioning as the “Court of Final Appeal.”
Under this framework, each protocol would maintain its own governance with established procedures for regular and emergency upgrades. Additionally, they would designate a specific contract capable of initiating an appeal process.
Decentralizing Smart Contracts Issue Resolution
Gluchowski also explains how the would work in the case of urgency. In the event of an emergency protocol upgrade, a designated appeal window would be instituted, allowing any user to raise objections to a higher court. However, individuals wishing to contest the upgrade would be required to provide a predetermined bail deposit.
In a hypothetical court hierarchy, protocols such as Aave and Uniswap would engage in disputes through courts like CourtUnchained or JusticeDAO. Following the rulings of these courts, parties would retain the right to escalate their case to the Ethereum Supreme Court.
Nonetheless, Gluchowski acknowledged that for the on-chain court to function effectively, it would necessitate robust social consensus. However, this could be expensive, and thus only “truly extraordinary” cases will be brought before it.
Gluchowski pointed out that while there are already some solutions to address these disputes, they are not entirely effective. For instance, implementing time-locked features in smart contracts may not be suitable for emergency situations. On the other hand, introducing a security council can help mitigate the problem but may not offer a complete solution and comes with its own set of risks.
“A security council could only freeze the contract temporarily, requiring a token governance approval for an emergency upgrade. But now a malicious majority of undercollaterized stakers could perform an evil take-over upgrade and steal all the assets,” he explained.
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: