👀 家人們,每天看行情、刷大佬觀點,卻從來不開口說兩句?你的觀點可能比你想的更有價值!
廣場新人 & 回歸福利正式上線!不管你是第一次發帖還是久違回歸,我們都直接送你獎勵!🎁
每月 $20,000 獎金等你來領!
📅 活動時間: 長期有效(月底結算)
💎 參與方式:
用戶需爲首次發帖的新用戶或一個月未發帖的回歸用戶。
發帖時必須帶上話題標籤: #我在广场发首帖 。
內容不限:幣圈新聞、行情分析、曬單吐槽、幣種推薦皆可。
💰 獎勵機制:
必得獎:發帖體驗券
每位有效發帖用戶都可獲得 $50 倉位體驗券。(注:每月獎池上限 $20,000,先到先得!如果大家太熱情,我們會繼續加碼!)
進階獎:發帖雙王爭霸
月度發帖王: 當月發帖數量最多的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
月度互動王: 當月帖子互動量(點讚+評論+轉發+分享)最高的用戶,額外獎勵 50U。
📝 發帖要求:
帖子字數需 大於30字,拒絕純表情或無意義字符。
內容需積極健康,符合社區規範,嚴禁廣告引流及違規內容。
💡 你的觀點可能會啓發無數人,你的第一次分享也許就是成爲“廣場大V”的起點,現在就開始廣場創作之旅吧!
Dogecoin Trademark Tussle: USPTO Rejects Application, Favoring Decentralization
In the wake of the recent growth and popularity of Dogecoin (Doge), the Dogecoin Foundation filed an application to trademark the “gold circular medallion” that features the letter “D” and the Shiba Inu dog. According to the latest report, this application has been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Per the details, Dogecoin Foundation attempted to register this mark for most of its services.
Multiple reasons have been cited by USPTO for the refusal and this includes “Failure to Function.” According to them, the “applied-for” mark appears as a universal symbol. In this case, it can not in any way function as a trademark or service mark. The USPTO statement further explains that consumers are likely to perceive it as the conveying of information about the service rather than being a unique identifier of the source
Another reason for rejection is the deive nature. USPTO explains that the “applied-for” mark only represents the deion of the applicant’s services. It is important to understand that the application captured the broader aspect of its services ranging from educational conferences in blockchain technology to software development
USPTO also cited “generic for the applicant’s services” as a reason to reject it. In this case, the mark cannot be trademarked even if it achieves widespread recognition as long as it is classified as “generic”.
More Reasons for the Dogecoin Foundation’s Trademark Application Rejection
The issue of “Evidence Of Acquired Distinctiveness” was also cited. Dogecoin Foundation provided evidence which includes a declaration by the president. However, the provided evidence was found to be insufficient. According to the USPTO, a more deive term must be accompanied by substantial evidence.
Another interesting observation is that Dogecoin Foundation used Ethereum in its argument, stating that the stance of USPTO remains questionable with the existence of Ethereum as a registered mark. In response, the Trademark Office stated that Ethereum has a consistent owner from the beginning, unlike Dogecoin
It is worth noting that the Dogecoin Foundation can still respond to the refusal with compelling evidence or a better argument for the registration
Dogecoin currently has a bearish market sentiment and has fallen by 0.6 percent in the last seven days, and 1.8 percent in the last 24 hours to trade at $0.062322
Best Crypto Exchange for Everyone: