Don'tCallMeABagHolder.

BTC/SOL/ETH are all included, the group is quite lively.

I'm now encountering extreme funding rates, and it's better to stay on the sidelines for now, not rushing to be the hero and take the other side. It's not that I'm afraid of losing money, mainly I'm worried about correctly judging the direction but being educated by volatility and liquidation levels... Honestly, when the market goes crazy, logic becomes worthless, and leverage is what really matters.
If I really had to take the other side, I would also be very cautious: small positions, staggered entries, preferring to miss out rather than force through. Extreme funding rates often coincide wi

I agree, sustainability is the key. As long as DUSD continues to hold up, I will consider adding some to my position.

You say people are really strange, when I make money I can still pretend to be calm, but when I lose even a little, I toss and turn all night. Floating gains automatically get discounted in my mind: not selling doesn’t count; floating losses are like a label stuck on my face, I can obviously bear it, but inside I keep hearing "Are you going to become liquidity again?" Basically, it’s not about the money, it’s that after being educated by the market several times, that shame of "I know my emotions are at the peak but I haven't pulled out" hurts even more.
Recently, there’s been a lot of talk ab

On my way to work, I check the on-chain activity. Recently, when looking at projects, I focus on two things: where the treasury funds are spent and whether the milestones match up. To put it simply, most of the money is being used for "ecosystem incentives," KOL collaborations, and conference travel, while the development wallets are surprisingly lean... I default to thinking: they’re buying attention, not building a product. Conversely, expenses like audits, developer salaries, infrastructure, and bug bounties— even if progress is slow—are more reassuring than daily pie-in-the-sky promises.
N

Lately I keep seeing people show off "whale addresses entering the market, wow!" I just want to laugh... First, clarify whether they are building a position or using spot to hedge. Just because you see on-chain buys doesn't mean they aren't taking short positions on derivatives to hedge risk. To put it simply, what you're following is their insurance policy, not their core position based on conviction.
Especially these past two days, when funding rates are extremely high or low, the group is arguing whether to reverse or keep squeezing the bubble. My experience is: the more unified the sentime

This order's RR is good. Follow the plan, and don't FOMO chasing highs.

To see whether the project team is actually working, I first look at how the treasury spends money.
They always use funds for "market cooperation" and "KOL promotion" in big buckets, and the milestones are always "ecological construction in progress," which basically means they treat you as liquidity.
Those who are truly serious about their work will have expenses aligned with milestones: audits, developer subsidies, bug bounties, infrastructure costs, even if they spend slowly but can explain clearly.
There's also a small detail: whether the milestones dare to state "unfinished/delayed

Lately, running testnet points has been a bit annoying for me. They say it’s “practice,” but in the end everyone treats it like an expectation for the next airdrop and just keeps grinding… Once you start keeping mental score, you’re not far from getting impulsive—before you know it, you’re well and truly hooked. My stop-loss is pretty brutal: if today I stay up late, just to check in or chase interactions, start adding to hardware positions, or get swept up in the group’s rhythm and start urging each other on, then I’m stopping for two days. If I miss out, then I miss out—anyway, I don’t want

Connecting Mantle to Owlto's cross-chain bridge is crucial. AI routing + low gas fees directly maximize the cross-chain experience. Go try this new liquidity channel.