OrigamiVolcano

1% monthly management fee + full tax exemption, this policy is a bit exaggerated, miners probably need to start calculating relocation costs.

Lately, my biggest feeling from watching the market isn't about how strong a certain coin is, but rather that the interest rate leash has tightened a bit, and risk appetite has immediately "shrunk." When money is expensive, everyone prefers to hold cash or short-term bonds for certainty. The message to the crypto side is: leverage shrinks first, positions become more short-term, and even when prices rise, it feels hesitant; when prices fall, it becomes especially smooth.
Right now, I’m more focused on a few on-chain lending curves, especially whether stablecoin borrowing suddenly picks up or i

Recently, I found that my tolerance for unrealized losses is really poor... Even when I have a paper profit, I just think "Hmm, not bad," and I should sleep or stay awake; once it turns red a bit, my mind immediately starts to exaggerate: Did I judge incorrectly, is the leverage stacking up on-chain again, should I reduce a bit, the more I think, the more restless. Honestly, unrealized losses feel like a reminder that "it might turn into real losses," while unrealized gains seem like "it could disappear at any moment," which makes me very uneasy.
These days, I’ve been arguing about whether the

These days, observing the liquidity of NFTs, it feels like the weather: when the floor price softens, everyone is still talking about narratives, but their hands are already looking for an exit. Royalties are also quite delicate; when it's hot, people say "creators should be respected," but when it cools down, they start complaining about friction costs. Basically, everyone wants liquidity but doesn't want to pay for it.
Social mining, fan tokens, that set of "attention as mining"—I have mixed feelings about it... Attention can indeed ignite a community, but once the rewards stop, it's hard to

Who would have thought that watching the Singapore stock market also requires paying attention to the US-Iran ceasefire deadline; macro factors are the primary driver.

Lately, I've been really obsessed with on-chain transactions, honestly, MEV is just about someone being able to see the queue earlier and cut in line to change the order. Who does it affect? Small users see it most directly: they clearly click to swap tokens, but end up losing slippage; market makers/arbitrageurs consider it "fair competition," but ordinary people feel like they've been secretly taxed. What's even more annoying is that during the testnet phase, with the incentives and point expectations, everyone was spamming interactions and betting whether the mainnet would issue tokens. A b

Same wishes! May your weekend be at full throttle 💪

Don't just focus on hype; the real opportunity is whether the trillion-yuan-scale scenario like the "domestic payment track" can be realized.

I'll wait and see for a while, wait until it exits the structure before speaking, as the biggest test of support comes after a strong pull.

Structurally shifting to strength essentially means the lows are rising, buying pressure is flowing back, and you should continue to observe the volume in conjunction.

Lately, I've been hearing people talk about "modularization" a lot, and at first, I found it a bit annoying: how does this really relate to ordinary users? After thinking about it, honestly, what you're feeling isn't just the concept, but the experience — with the same transfers/interactions, the chain is less likely to get congested, transaction fees won't fluctuate wildly from sky-high to low, and confirmations are more stable; also, applications can iterate faster, you can use them on chain A today and move to chain B tomorrow, smoothly transferring your account assets, avoiding the pitfall

Still so low-key after surpassing a thousand, gotta celebrate a bit.

Recently, I've seen people use the curve of stablecoin supply to prove that "ETF = new money entering the market." I also look at it, but don't mistake correlation for causation... Sometimes stablecoins are just on-chain leverage shifting positions or reducing risk, or the off-chain settlement habits changing. A nice-looking chart doesn't mean money is really falling from the sky. ETFs are more like a channel; even if the channel is open, it might just be turnover of existing assets. Frankly, I'm now more interested in monitoring signals of "who's increasing leverage, who's being forced to red