Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Here comes another "coincidental transfer," is it really just good luck that it all happens to match? Fine, fine, I get it—there's no ID on the chain, but the path can still be traced: first, check if the source of funds is the same batch of entry (same exchange hot wallet / same bridge), then see if there's any "cleaning" action in the middle (multi-hop, small dispersed amounts, fixed intervals), and finally, see if the destination is the same set of receiving addresses or contract interaction habits. Many people only focus on the last hop and start shouting conspiracy; actually, it looks more like the same group of people following the same process. Recently, retail traders have been criticizing validators for MEV extraction and unfair ordering, but I think this explanation makes more sense: you think it's a coincidence, but in reality, everyone is just avoiding the same knife, fighting for the same queue position... To put it plainly, the most common thing on the chain isn't "seems like a coincidence" standard operating procedures.