Mehmet Aydın, known by the nickname "Tosuncuk" among the public, made an interesting proposal in a letter he sent from prison. He claims to own Bitcoin mining facilities in Paraguay and Uruguay. He suggests that if he is released under judicial control, he could cover the victims' damages with the income generated from these facilities. This case draws attention as an intersection of the crypto world with legal processes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerLiquidated
· 11-22 20:00
Dude, you can come up with this trap? You even dare to establish a family man persona while being an entrepreneur in prison?
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBro
· 11-22 12:00
LOL this guy is really good at making up stories. A Bitcoin mining farm in South America? Yeah, right, I totally believe you.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvester
· 11-19 20:48
LMAO, a person in prison is still thinking about using Bitcoin to launder money, this script is absurd to the max.
View OriginalReply0
ZKProofEnthusiast
· 11-19 20:41
Haha, this is the legendary "Entrepreneurship in Prison"? A Bitcoin Mining Farm in South America sounds ridiculous... Does he really think the judge is a fool?
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 11-19 20:20
Ha, this guy really knows how to tell a story. He's still bragging about the Bitcoin Mining Farm in prison, and he's even daring to talk about business in South America.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 11-19 20:19
Are there Bitcoin Mining Farms in prison? This trap is even more absurd than his previous Ponzi Scheme, and blood fundraising is back.
Mehmet Aydın, known by the nickname "Tosuncuk" among the public, made an interesting proposal in a letter he sent from prison. He claims to own Bitcoin mining facilities in Paraguay and Uruguay. He suggests that if he is released under judicial control, he could cover the victims' damages with the income generated from these facilities. This case draws attention as an intersection of the crypto world with legal processes.