🎉 Gate Square — Share Your Funniest Crypto Moments & Win a $100 Joy Fund!
Crypto can be stressful, so let’s laugh it out on Gate Square.
Whether it’s a liquidation tragedy, FOMO madness, or a hilarious miss—you name it.
Post your funniest crypto moment and win your share of the Joy Fund!
💰 Rewards
10 creators with the funniest posts
Each will receive $10 in tokens
📝 How to Join
1⃣️ Follow Gate_Square
2⃣️ Post with the hashtag #MyCryptoFunnyMoment
3⃣️ Any format works: memes, screenshots, short videos, personal stories, fails, chaos—bring it on.
📌 Notes
Hashtag #MyCryptoFunnyMoment is requ
Tether CEO Fires Back at S&P Downgrade: “They Didn’t Do Their Homework”
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino has strongly rejected S&P Global Ratings’ recent downgrade of USDt’s peg stability to the lowest possible score, calling the assessment “incomplete and misleading.”
What S&P Got Wrong, According to Tether
S&P cited Tether’s exposure to Bitcoin (5.6% of reserves) and other “higher-risk” assets like gold and secured loans as the primary reason for the “weak” rating, warning that a sharp BTC price drop could threaten the 1:1 peg.
(Sources: X)
Ardoino countered that the agency:
Market Reaction and Broader Context
Despite the downgrade, USDt has traded within ±0.01% of $1.00 across major venues, with no visible de-pegging pressure. 24-hour volume remains above $50 billion, and redemption queues are normal, and the token’s market cap sits at $184.5 billion — still the largest stablecoin by a wide margin.
Analysts note that S&P’s methodology appears to penalize diversification into yield-generating assets (U.S. Treasuries, BTC, gold, loans) while giving higher marks only to cash-like holdings — a stance that disadvantages profitable stablecoin issuers.
Bottom Line
While S&P’s report made headlines, the market has largely shrugged it off. USDt continues to function normally, redemptions, trading, and settlements, backed by the strongest reserve report in Tether’s history.
For now, the downgrade appears to be more noise than signal — another chapter in the ongoing tension between traditional rating agencies and the cryptocurrency industry they still struggle to understand.