Futuros
Aceda a centenas de contratos perpétuos
TradFi
Ouro
Plataforma de ativos tradicionais globais
Opções
Hot
Negoceie Opções Vanilla ao estilo europeu
Conta Unificada
Maximize a eficiência do seu capital
Negociação de demonstração
Introdução à negociação de futuros
Prepare-se para a sua negociação de futuros
Eventos de futuros
Participe em eventos para recompensas
Negociação de demonstração
Utilize fundos virtuais para experimentar uma negociação sem riscos
Lançamento
CandyDrop
Recolher doces para ganhar airdrops
Launchpool
Faça staking rapidamente, ganhe potenciais novos tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Detenha GT e obtenha airdrops maciços de graça
Launchpad
Chegue cedo ao próximo grande projeto de tokens
Pontos Alpha
Negoceie ativos on-chain para airdrops
Pontos de futuros
Ganhe pontos de futuros e receba recompensas de airdrop
Investimento
Simple Earn
Ganhe juros com tokens inativos
Investimento automático
Invista automaticamente de forma regular.
Investimento Duplo
Aproveite a volatilidade do mercado
Soft Staking
Ganhe recompensas com staking flexível
Empréstimo de criptomoedas
0 Fees
Dê em garantia uma criptomoeda para pedir outra emprestada
Centro de empréstimos
Centro de empréstimos integrado
Centro de Património VIP
Aumento de património premium
Gestão de património privado
Alocação de ativos premium
Fundo Quant
Estratégias quant de topo
Staking
Faça staking de criptomoedas para ganhar em produtos PoS
Alavancagem inteligente
New
Alavancagem sem liquidação
Cunhagem de GUSD
Cunhe GUSD para retornos RWA
Why are investors suing JPMorgan over a $328M crypto Ponzi case?
The lawsuit claims JPMorgan served as Goliath’s primary bank during the operation, processing deposits and transfers to Coinbase wallets despite multiple warning signs.
More than 2,000 investors are believed to have been affected.
What the lawsuit alleges
The complaint argues that JPMorgan “provided the essential banking infrastructure” that allowed Goliath Ventures to run its operations despite red flags that investors say should have raised alarms.
According to the filing, roughly $253 million was deposited into a JPMorgan account linked to Goliath between January 2023 and June 2025.
Around $123 million was then transferred from that account to Coinbase wallets, while approximately $50 million was distributed to investors as supposed returns.
Investigators believe Goliath ultimately collected at least $328 million from more than 2,000 investors.
The complaint contends that a fraud of this scale could not have moved through a single banking channel without detection, given the magnitude and flow of funds.
How the scheme worked and who is charged
Authorities say Goliath Ventures, previously known as Gen-Z Venture Firm, accepted investor deposits through JPMorgan accounts before moving funds to cryptocurrency wallets maintained on Coinbase.
Christopher Alexander Delgado, identified as the operator behind Goliath, has been arrested on charges of wire fraud and money laundering.
The complaint also raises concerns about Know Your Customer compliance, alleging the bank knew Goliath was functioning as an unlicensed “private equity” cryptocurrency pool operator.
It further claims investor funds were commingled and used to pay earlier participants, a pattern consistent with classic Ponzi scheme mechanics.
If convicted on all counts, Delgado could face up to 30 years in federal prison.
Other banks and payment paths
Court filings indicate Goliath also maintained accounts at Bank of America.
Delgado was reportedly a co-signatory on one of the accounts held in the company’s name.
Investors were directed to deposit funds either into JPMorgan or Bank of America accounts, or send money directly to Goliath-controlled Coinbase wallets.
Investigators say Delgado held sole control over those wallets.
Responses and what happens next
The complaint was filed by investor Robby Alan Steele and legal counsel representing affected investors. The lawsuit does not yet specify a total damages amount.
Attorneys involved in the case say additional complaints may follow as more individuals and entities believed to have played a role are identified.
The strategy is aimed at pursuing claims carefully to maximize recovery for investors.
At the center of the case is whether JPMorgan failed to act on alleged warning signs while handling Goliath’s accounts.
The outcome could influence how banks monitor high-risk clients and crypto-related transactions going forward.
The post Why are investors suing JPMorgan over a $328M crypto Ponzi case? appeared first on Invezz