Recently, someone was talking about "on-chain privacy," saying it’s like an invisibility cloak... I think ordinary users should set their expectations straight: on-chain is inherently a traceable public ledger, and privacy tools are more about "reducing correlation costs" rather than making you disappear from the compliant world. If you really encounter deposit/withdrawal, fiat channels, or centralized services, you still need to cooperate; don’t dream of a magic one-click whitewash.



AI Agents/auto-trading is also quite interesting. Some are busy touting "fully automated ways to make money for you," while others are scrutinizing interaction permissions and contract risks. To put it simply: handing your private key to a script, letting it sign a bunch of transactions, doesn’t give you privacy—it just speeds up the chance of a crash. Anyway, I’d rather do less now than rush in without understanding authorization and logs.

I see complexity as the enemy: if I can avoid it, I avoid it; if I can minimize permissions, I minimize permissions. That’s how I’ll start.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin