Recently, people keep telling me how awesome modular blockchains are. Honestly, as an end user, I only have two feelings: don’t get stuck on transfers, don’t have fees that feel like taxes, and the rest of the “execution layer/settlement layer” sounds very advanced. But when I click confirm, I only care about not failing and not being overcharged. If I had to say what’s really changing, it’s probably that project teams can more easily assemble a “seamless-looking” chain, and also break down the blame into smaller pieces: if something goes wrong, who’s really at fault? Anyway, it’s not me.



These days, I saw people comparing RWA, US bond yields, and on-chain yield products all together, and the comment section was arguing like they were choosing a class monitor. I just think… it doesn’t matter who the yields look like; what matters is that when it’s time to redeem, it doesn’t turn into “governance voting to delay redemption.” Whether it’s modular or integrated, I no longer chase explanations. As long as it can be executed, can be exited, and incentives don’t just talk, that’s enough.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin