Recently, I've been hearing project teams hype up the "modular/DA layer" like crazy, developers are excited beyond belief, but users (including myself) are a bit confused... So now my way of judging credibility is pretty basic: first, check GitHub to see if they only update the README, look at the commit history for continuity, and whether the core code is maintained by the same group over the long term; then look at the audit reports, focusing not on those big logos, but on "what was found, how it was fixed, and whether there was a re-audit after the fix." If some reports are written as if they didn't exist, I just give a cross.

As for multi-signature upgrades, honestly, it’s about "who can move your money." The threshold for signatures, whether the signers are all insiders, whether there’s a timelock (giving you time to run away), these are more important than the narrative. I’m also feeling pretty discouraged, it seems like there’s more and more to check... But on the flip side, at least there’s a trail to follow, no need to rely solely on faith. Anyway, I’d rather take it slow and keep my private keys tight.