Recently, someone always asks me: how does a newbie really judge whether a project is "reliable"? The first thing I check myself isn't Twitter, but GitHub — not how advanced the code is, but whether updates are consistent, whether issues/PRs have serious responses, and whether there’s a review after problems arise. Then I look into audit reports, not just focusing on the words "audited," but paying attention to what scope was written, whether any major issues were "accepted as risk," and whether follow-up fixes were made later. When upgrading multi-signature setups, don’t ignore who the signers are, what the threshold is, and whether rules can be changed suddenly — in plain terms, who can just decide to move your money with a snap of the finger. These days, I’ve also been talking about interest rate cut expectations and the dollar index — watching risk assets rise and fall together is exhausting… The more I see this, the more I just want things to slow down and be more expensive, but not chaotic. Oh right, I regret not the outcome, but that I was too lazy to take a closer look at that report back then.