Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just closed a few yield aggregator pages, and seeing that exaggerated APY made me feel a bit guilty... To be honest, what you're getting isn't "revenue," but a collection of questions about how the contracts transfer funds, how they authorize, who can upgrade, and who bears the responsibility if the underlying pools have issues. No matter how smooth the frontend is built, it can't hide the fact that an upgradable contract with admin privileges can change the rules at any time.
Recently, that main public chain has been upgrading/maintaining itself, and the community is speculating whether the ecosystem will migrate. I'm more concerned about: who signs off on cross-chain transfers, who holds custody, and which bridge has a history of incidents that could fill an entire page. Anyway, I now get into the habit of opening the permissions list first; if I see "unlimited authorization," I revoke it immediately. No matter how attractive the APY is, I won't trade security for it.