These days, there's again debate over whether secondary royalties should be mandatory.

Honestly, I lean a bit toward the "want royalties" side, but I also don't really believe that "platform enforcement" can last long-term.
To put it simply, royalties are essentially a tug-of-war between creators and liquidity:
If enforced, buyers feel like they're being gouged;
If not enforced, creators feel like they're being exploited for free.
So, could we look at it from a different angle—separating "payment" from the transaction, for example, by tying identity/membership and verifiable contribution proofs on-chain, making support a clear relationship rather than bargaining every time there's a transfer.

In the group chat, people are now sharing about stablecoin regulation and reserve audits, while also posting images of "de-pegging," which is quite contagious.
It feels similar to the royalty dispute—everyone is actually looking for a "certainty switch":
Ideally, a rule that solves everything once and for all.
But many things on the chain just aren't that stable, so I'll just assume the risk as the default setting and try it out gradually.