World Liberty Financial just posted a governance proposal to restructure 62.28 Billion locked $WLFI tokens.


Key points:
• Up to 10% burn planned
• 40.7B tokens to start vesting for founders & team
• Tokens were previously locked indefinitely
• Comes after recent $75M loan controversy
Token unlock + vesting could bring new supply pressure to the market.
Execution, timelines, and transparency will decide the reaction. 👀
WLFI-1.82%
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 13
  • 13
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
ReboundAtTheStreetCornerAfter
· 9h ago
Immediately after the 75M lending controversy, a governance proposal was pushed forward, somewhat like "revising the narrative." Transparency needs to keep up; otherwise, the market will just sell off first and ask questions later.
View OriginalReply0
NekoOnCall
· 04-17 01:03
Previously, the indefinite lock-up rule was suddenly changed, and the trust cost is very high.
View OriginalReply0
RugProofMaybe
· 04-16 13:56
40.7B allocated to the team for unlocking and vesting; this supply pressure cannot be offset by a simple burn. The key factors are the specific unlocking schedule and whether there is a lock-up period buffer.
View OriginalReply0
FrozenLargePear
· 04-16 03:27
说白了,我要锁仓拉盘了,你们这些大户就干瞪眼看看吧😃
Reply0
Gleamingglide
· 04-16 03:23
Destroying 10% sounds appealing, but unlocking is the real key.
Reply0
Gleamingglide
· 04-16 03:22
To The Moon 🌕
Reply0
StopMessingAroundWithGasFees.
· 04-16 02:42
Can governance voting reveal wallets, schedules, and executors? Otherwise, it's just a paper plan.
View OriginalReply0
DustyAirdropper
· 04-16 02:35
Destroying 10% sounds appealing, but unlocking is the real key.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-953e1a14
· 04-16 02:33
If the unlocking is structured as quarterly linear releases combined with performance conditions, the impact will be much smaller; the biggest concern is a one-time large release.
View OriginalReply0
SandwichAlertAgent
· 04-16 02:25
The proposal itself isn't bad; what's bad is the opaque execution and ad-hoc rule changes. Providing sufficient timelines, audit reports, and voting rules will earn market approval.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin