Quantitative Cognition

And why I keep insisting on quantitative trading
1. Trends 2. Operates 24 hours a day 3. Frees up hands 4. Say goodbye to emotions 5. I have also participated in many competitions, the results are not too bad, but I tried comparing with quantitative trading and simply can't beat it. The final conclusion is, watching the market every day and daydreaming, if the funds haven't changed, then isn't entering the market to make money? Earning passively is definitely better. So no matter what you do every day, in the end, it's about seeing whether your funds have grown after 1 month, 3 months, or a year. As long as they have, I haven't spent any effort to achieve that.

Second: Most traders and streamers who don't open real accounts are just losing money, not even in the right direction. Strong skills don't mean the curve is positive. The ultimate reason is still emotions, mentality, and self-control. And streamers analyzing the market but not trading are quite accurate; doing it yourself for a while is a common problem. The hardest part to solve is emotions, not skills. Actually, most streamers and traders are already highly skilled; technical 🟰 sniping is strong, mentality 🟰 is fast, position 🟰 is about distance. All three are indispensable. Don't waste time switching sniper rifles; it doesn't make much sense. All sniper rifles, without considering wind speed and distance, will be off.

Third: As for the issue of liquidation, black swan events, and large one-sided trades, many people ask questions.
What I want to say is, before asking this question, ask yourself: how do you handle black swan events? The way you handle quantitative trading is how you should handle it. Your stop-loss is also part of quantitative trading, but after a loss, you might still get caught in a trap, like eating a needle. This is something you can't accomplish. Why do you think you can lose with quantitative trading and still win? Does that mean the direction of quantitative trading is always opposite to the market? What we can do is control risk management more strictly, that's all.
Currently, my optimized quantitative trading has backtesting, stop-loss, minimal initial capital, and almost no liquidation risk. Can it be executed so strictly on every trade? Can you? That’s where most people's thinking is distorted. Big players look at monthly returns and risk control, not at the speed of liquidation. I believe that my low-leverage quantitative trading can also achieve 15-20% monthly returns. The important thing is that my funds are growing while you're still stuck fantasizing about a single trade.

That’s why I choose to focus deeply on quantitative trading. Those eager for quick results naturally treat it as a tool for daily position flipping, but I only think it’s more strictly enforced than I can do myself. I know I can't do it myself, so I let it replace me—it's that simple.
So I plan not to continue obsessing over technical skills but to focus on stable profits and risk control, monthly returns. I don't promote it because they don't understand the logic. They will naturally come to me if they need it—that's a matter of demand!