Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, looking at address profiles with labels like "whale/intelligent money/some specific group," the more I look, the more I feel I can only trust about 70% of it... Clustering algorithms are basically guesses, after all. If you switch to a different exchange for deposits and withdrawals, cross a bridge, and add some common batch transfer tools, the profile immediately looks very much like "another person." Not to mention now there are a bunch of contracts, proxies, and AA wallets mixed together, and sometimes labels are like putting a name tag on a shadow. (I'm the kind of person educated by rollbacks, so I only trust confirmed numbers.)
Modularization and the DA layer have been very popular lately; developers are indeed excited, but ordinary users probably find the flow of funds chart even more confusing: how the money moves, which layer it reaches, whether it’s the same entity... My current approach is: treat labels as hints, not conclusions; before copying trades, first look at the trading rhythm and final block confirmation, don’t be misled by the word "smart."