I'm now evaluating whether the project is reliable or not. Anyway, the first thing I don't look at is TPS or how loudly they shout about subsidies (recently, the constant bickering over L2 has become a bit tiresome). I'm more concerned about whether their treasury funds are being spent "in line with milestones." It's not about spending less; the key is whether they can produce verifiable results after spending: code updates, audit progress, mainnet/testnet deliveries, governance proposals clearly stating who gets what, and post-mortem reviews upon completion. I'm most afraid of those who say they're building something while their treasury expenditures are all lumped into "ecosystem cooperation/market" without clear details, muddling everything together. Honestly, I'd rather they move a bit slower and argue less, as long as their accounts and milestone deliveries match up. Otherwise, I might just pretend I didn't see anything... First, relax your position; being able to sleep peacefully is the most important.