In the past few days, the NFT royalty debate has flared up again, essentially about creators' income versus secondary market liquidity pulling in opposite directions. Others think that just adding a royalty toggle can "fairly distribute" income, but in actual trading paths, inserting an extra condition makes routing immediately more complex. In the end, market makers or aggregators will bypass it first, and you'll have to track which hop takes the royalty or skip it altogether.

I sympathize with creators, but it's also hard to expect the secondary market to voluntarily pay... On-chain, transactions follow rules, not morals. Now it seems more like: royalties must be "exchanged" through native markets and tightly integrated experiences, rather than relying on voluntary deductions across the entire network. Anyway, I’ll keep analyzing the routing, see exactly where the money flows, and then decide which side to support.