Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
There is a very interesting discussion happening in the market right now. Mike McGlone, strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence, has been warning that the decline in cryptocurrencies could signal something bigger – a possible financial stress that precedes a recession in the U.S. And he doesn’t rule out the possibility: he’s talking about Bitcoin potentially dropping back to $10,000.
Now, here’s the point: this forced perspective of a total collapse divides analysts quite a bit. McGlone argues that the “buy the dip” mentality that has supported risk assets since 2008 may be coming to an end. He points to concerning indicators – the market capitalization of U.S. stocks relative to GDP has reached levels not seen in about a century, while the volatility of the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 is at an eight-year low. It’s like a speck of gold that no one sees, but it’s there.
Bitcoin is currently hovering around $74,240 after rising to $70,841 in mid-February. McGlone drew a chart comparing Bitcoin divided by 10 with the S&P 500, suggesting that if the broader stock market weakens, Bitcoin (which he describes as “volatile and beta-dependent”) probably won’t withstand. His baseline scenario predicts a reversal to around $10,000, conditioned on a peak in the U.S. stock market.
But not everyone agrees. Jason Fernandes, co-founder of AdLunam and market analyst, questioned this logic. According to him, this forced perspective assumes that extremes must resolve through collapse – what he calls “false equivalence.” Markets can resolve excess over time, through rotation or inflationary erosion. A macro slowdown could mean consolidation around $40,000 to $50,000, not necessarily a liquidation to $10,000.
Fernandes has a point: a drop to $10,000 would require a true systemic event – severe liquidity contraction, widening credit spreads, forced deleveraging, and disorderly stock declines. This implies a recession beyond financial stress. Without a credit shock or policy mistake that depletes global liquidity, this kind of collapse remains a low-probability tail risk.
The broader crypto market is also under pressure. Last Monday, 85 of the top 100 tokens posted losses. Monero and Zcash fell 10% and 8%, respectively, in 24 hours. McGlone also mentioned that the “Trump euphoria” peaked and is contributing to contagion in markets, while gold and silver are “capturing alpha” at a rate not seen in about half a century.
The debate is basically this: McGlone sees macroeconomic warning signs pointing to a severe correction, while Fernandes argues there are less catastrophic paths. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle – but for now, the market continues to navigate this uncertainty.