Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've been looking at governance voting again, and the more I watch, the more it seems like "delegation = convenience," eventually turning into a few people nodding on behalf of the entire network... I'm also lazy myself, and sometimes I just delegate my small amount of votes to familiar nodes for convenience, but honestly, who are we really governing? It feels like governance tokens are more like stamping resource allocation, and ordinary people's participation feels quite weak.
A couple of days ago, that mainstream public chain was about to upgrade/maintain, and everyone in the group was guessing whether the ecosystem would migrate. What I care more about is: in case of real issues, are the decisions still made by those few big players, with voting just going through the motions? Anyway, I now try to split my staking and layered yields, not pouring too much water at once, and if I can withdraw, I do a little at a time, taking it slow.