Recently, everyone has been discussing on-chain privacy and compliance boundaries. To put it simply, ordinary users shouldn't expect to be "completely invisible." On-chain data is inherently public, and tools and tagging systems are not infallible—they can sometimes lag or be misled. But in the end, if you really want to investigate, you can still piece together clues... My personal expectation is: don't make everyday transfers as complicated as money laundering routes, avoid cross-chain/mixing actions as much as possible, and if you do use them, be aware that the worst-case scenario is being frozen or asked to explain the source.



What I fear most is not slowness, but chaos—taking things slowly allows for address and path verification, while chaos makes it easy to stumble into the wrong pools/bridges, with funds stuck in the middle. Anyway, I now prefer to wait for a few more confirmations, look at liquidity gaps more carefully, rather than having to prove my innocence later with a bunch of transaction records.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin