In the past two days, the group has been discussing "a certain stablecoin losing its peg" and "reserve audits being suspicious." As I watch, I feel increasingly anxious: if something really happens, the first wave of collapse usually isn't the price, but trust.

I casually looked over our DAO proposals, which on the surface say "incentivize active voting," but in reality, they only reward certain voting paths, effectively shifting power quietly toward specific individuals or groups. To put it simply, voting isn't about asking whether you agree or not; it's about guiding you to take sides. If you're truly concerned about security and governance, don't just look at the headlines and the sugar rewards—pay attention to who proposes, who can change parameters, and who holds the most authority... I'll be watching these over the weekend; after all, one scam is enough.