Federal appeals court orders end to SAVE plan used by millions of student loan borrowers

The U.S. Department of Education headquarters is seen on March 06, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images News | Getty Images

A federal appeals court has ordered the end of the Saving on a Valuable Education, or SAVE, plan, the Biden-administration-era repayment program that brought lower monthly bills to millions of student loan borrowers.

In a judgment issued late on Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed a lower court’s dismissal of a Republican-led legal challenge against SAVE.

The Biden administration introduced the SAVE plan in 2023, billing it as “the most affordable repayment plan ever created.” Under the program, many borrowers expected to see their monthly bills cut in half. But Republican-led legal challenges quickly put the plan on ice.

In February, Judge John Ross of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri dismissed the main lawsuit against SAVE.

Consumer advocates and borrowers hoped that the development meant the program would be revived temporarily. President Donald Trump’s “big beautiful bill” phases out the SAVE plan as of July 1, 2028.

More than 7 million student loan borrowers remain enrolled in the SAVE plan as of the fourth quarter, according to the U.S. Department of Education.

The U.S. Department of Education did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read more CNBC personal finance coverage

• SAVE plan used by millions of student loan borrowers is over, court orders
• Identity theft and your taxes: It’s ‘a terrible reverse lottery,’ one victim says
• As Iran war disrupts oil prices, consumers could be ‘hammered,’ economist says
• Million-dollar earners have already stopped paying into Social Security for 2026
• Women and the K-shaped economy: Lower pay, affordability issues reduce spending
• Small 401(k) accounts may follow workers to their next job — except Roth money
• In a jobs apocalypse, look to ‘AI-proof’ skilled trades, career experts say
• Middle-income homebuyers have $30,000 more buying power than a year ago
• Average IRS tax refund is up 10.6%, early filing data shows
• GOP ‘big beautiful bill’ to deal ‘shock’ to the ACA marketplace: health experts
• As millions claim Trump’s ‘no tax on overtime’ deduction, filers risk mistakes
• S&P 500 shrugs off 1% daily drops all the time. Investors can too, advisors say
• Where investors can look for stability as the Iran war rattles markets
• What the Iran war market turmoil means for those nearing retirement
• Musk says Grok can help with your taxes. What experts say about AI and tax prep
• CNBC’s Financial Advisor 100: Best financial advisors, top firms ranked

On Monday, four borrowers represented by Public Goods Practice, LLP, filed a lawsuit against the Department of Education, arguing the agency is compelled to immediately implement the SAVE plan. They say the department’s refusal to enact the SAVE plan and provide lower payments and loan discharge to eligible borrowers violates federal administrative law.

The lawsuit was filed just hours before the Eighth Circuit Court’s decision to reverse the earlier dismissal.

One of the plaintiffs, Elizabeth Robeson from South Carolina, said in the suit that she borrowed $12,000 in student loans during the 1980s, when she attended the University of Mississippi. She made more than 100 monthly payments beyond the 216 required for her to earn debt forgiveness under SAVE, but today her balance has swelled to $93,000.

“I have never been out of compliance on this loan and have paid for decades,” Robeson said in the suit. “The student loan crisis has cruelly forced millions of working Americans like me to live in a labyrinth with no clear exit despite our having followed the law.”

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.