Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Most people don't need a model as advanced as Claude for their AI needs and tasks. Minimax and Kimi are sufficient.
For a period, many people said that these large models' chatbots had no moat, or that intelligence was the biggest moat.
Everyone would ruthlessly abandon low-IQ LLMs. That was indeed the case during that time, especially in the days after Gemini 3.0 was released.
But now, as these large models have developed to this point, the marginal utility of their increasing capabilities for ordinary users is actually diminishing.
At this stage, the importance of usage costs and user experience becomes more prominent, which is precisely where Chinese companies excel.
ByteDance's Doubao represents the ultimate experience (including speech recognition, dialect support, video recording, response speed).
Kimi and Minimax represent the ultimate cost compression. Most people's AI needs are just an enhanced version of Baidu, and in that case, Minimax is more than enough.
The future landscape might be that Claude moves toward the extreme of B2B, where programmers have very high requirements for the model's intelligence level, making the enterprise side the main demand for Claude.
Meanwhile, the C-side will be captured by models like Kimi, Minimax, and Doubao, which can provide relatively good user experiences at the lowest possible cost.