OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot) is an open-source autonomous AI agent tool developed by Peter Steinberger. It gained rapid popularity in early 2026, especially after its name was finalized, becoming one of the hottest projects in the global AI community. Behind the hype, it’s worth questioning whether OpenClaw is truly effective and suitable for most people. Crypto influencer Miles Deutscher has used OpenClaw for some time and believes it’s not suitable for the majority, recommending beginners start with other tools. Below are the details.
I know the title of this article is ironic, since much of my AI workflow is built using OpenClaw. I post about it weekly. I even created a series called “Day X of Building My AI Team.”
But I have to tell you: most people shouldn’t use it.
Before criticizing me, hear me out. This isn’t an anti-OpenClaw article, but a critique of the hype. Too many content creators chase after OpenClaw for traffic without telling the truth. The reality is: for most people, there are better alternatives now.
And in the past week, the landscape has changed dramatically.
Insider Secrets Behind the Hype
Here’s the real experience of 90% of people using OpenClaw:
You see those viral tweets. You buy a Mac Mini. You install OpenClaw. You spend a weekend configuring proxies. You feel like a genius. About two days later. Then you realize you have no idea what to automate.
Your workflow gets interrupted. Your proxy setup encounters errors. You spend more time debugging than actually working. Now, you have a machine worth over $1,000, but it can only do tasks that a $20/month subscription service could handle.
I’ve seen this happen dozens of times in DMs (and with friends/employees). The problem isn’t the tool itself, but the approach.
But no one in the OpenClaw community seems to notice this.
While they’re busy debugging proxy configs, Anthropic, Notion, and other companies have released announcements that completely change the game.
Latest Announcements (and Why They Change Everything)
In recent weeks, a series of announcements have truly shifted perceptions about whether OpenClaw is suitable for most people. Here’s a breakdown:
Claude Code - Remote Control (Mobile Version)
Anthropic launched a mobile version of Claude Code called “Remote Control.” You can scan a QR code on your device to control Claude Code via iPhone or Android.
No need for Mac Mini, VPS, servers, or desktop terminals. Just send tasks from your phone, and Claude will build in the background.
One major advantage of OpenClaw is its accessibility via platforms like Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord — and the launch of Remote Control solves this for many users.
Claude Cowork Business Update
If Claude Code is aimed at developers, then Cowork is for everyone. It’s a GUI-based intelligent assistant capable of real work: not just answering questions, but executing multi-step tasks within your existing tools.
They recently added integrations with Slack, Figma, Canva, Box, and Clay. Plus, they launched plugins for finance, HR, design, and private equity sectors.
After Anthropic released finance plugins, a software sector ETF dropped 6% in a single day. On February 20, after Claude Code Security was released, cybersecurity stocks plummeted that afternoon.
This shows how much the market values this product.
For most people, tasks like research, document management, content workflows, and data analysis—Cowork already covers about 80% of what they need.
Notion Agents
This feature has been underestimated, but it really shouldn’t be (especially for Notion users like me).
Notion rebuilt its entire AI system into autonomous agents. These aren’t chatbots; they can independently perform multi-step workflows over 20 minutes, with memory capabilities. They can connect to Slack, Google Drive, GitHub, and you can set execution times and triggers.
For knowledge work—project management, meeting prep, research, content planning, database management—Notion Agents outperform most OpenClaw setups, and the entry barrier is nearly zero.
If your main goal with OpenClaw is “manage my business and automate workflows,” then honestly, Notion Agents are a good starting point.
Manus / n8n / Zapier
I won’t spend too much time on these tools now (more in-depth content coming later). But it’s clear: for basic automation like email scraping, web searches, SOP generation, lead enrichment—these tools can handle it.
If you haven’t fully utilized these tools, you probably don’t need to buy a Mac Mini.
Unmentioned Scalability Issues
OpenClaw community also overlooks a scalability problem.
Claude Code can scale infinitely in the cloud. More computing power, parallel tasks, better performance—it grows with your needs. OpenClaw runs on your hardware. When hardware hits its limits, your only option is to buy another Mac Mini.
And it’s not just about scalability. Claude Code integrates directly into GitHub, VS Code, and Xcode via MCP. They recently added features like security scans, lifecycle hooks, hot reload, and session switching across devices. This ecosystem expands weekly.
For most users, cloud-based tools are more practical.
OpenClaw’s Advantages
But OpenClaw still has unmatched advantages.
Complete local control. Your data never leaves your machine. Critical for handling sensitive business data, client info, or proprietary workflows.
Complex multi-agent orchestration. Running five interconnected, task-distributing, coordinated agents—something cloud tools currently can’t do. This is where OpenClaw truly outperforms all others (and why many still use it).
Custom agent features. SOUL files, detailed configs, agents that deeply understand your business background—such customization isn’t available elsewhere.
24/7 autonomous operation. Once set up properly, your agents can run around the clock without incurring subscription costs that eat into profits. Long-term, if you prepare well, OpenClaw can be more cost-effective.
True ownership. You own the entire tech stack, especially if you run local models.
If you’ve invested time building a suitable OpenClaw environment with real, validated use cases, you’re still in a strong position.
But given the ongoing industry updates, my personal view on OpenClaw is:
It’s a great tool, but not the only one. I use Claude Code for specific models/workflows. I use Notion Agents for business automation. I even use GPT for strategy.
In my opinion, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. The best approach is to use specific tools for specific purposes. OpenClaw is especially useful for data scraping automation and autonomous product iteration—but that’s a personal choice.
So, what should you do?
If you’re a beginner, here are my sincere recommendations:
First: Start with Claude (choose Cowork or Code based on your skill level). Get familiar with what AI agents can do in your specific workflow. I believe this is the best starting point for 99% of people.
Second: Add Notion Agents and/or Manus/n8n for your knowledge work and basic automation. Test what’s worth automating and what’s not. It’s a low-risk way to experiment with new workflows.
Third: When you find these tools aren’t enough, then turn to OpenClaw. Because now you know exactly what you need it to do.
Most people jump straight to step three and wonder why OpenClaw doesn’t work well.
Summary
OpenClaw is excellent for some, and if you want to stay at the forefront of AI, it’s definitely worth trying.
But hype has led people to believe that buying hardware and configuring proxies is the way to leverage AI. That’s not true. The right approach is to first identify which parts need automation, test with easy-to-use tools, and only upgrade to OpenClaw when necessary.
I still use OpenClaw daily and believe in it. But pretending it’s everyone’s starting point is misleading.
Start with the tools mentioned above, get comfortable, then build your machine.
That’s the right order. Most people get it backwards.
Related: Deep Dive into OpenClaw: Filtering Logic of 3,002 Community Skills and Ecosystem Overview
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Don't be fooled by the hype; most people are not suitable for using OpenClaw.
Author: Miles Deutscher, Crypto Influencer
Translation: Felix, PANews
OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot) is an open-source autonomous AI agent tool developed by Peter Steinberger. It gained rapid popularity in early 2026, especially after its name was finalized, becoming one of the hottest projects in the global AI community. Behind the hype, it’s worth questioning whether OpenClaw is truly effective and suitable for most people. Crypto influencer Miles Deutscher has used OpenClaw for some time and believes it’s not suitable for the majority, recommending beginners start with other tools. Below are the details.
I know the title of this article is ironic, since much of my AI workflow is built using OpenClaw. I post about it weekly. I even created a series called “Day X of Building My AI Team.”
But I have to tell you: most people shouldn’t use it.
Before criticizing me, hear me out. This isn’t an anti-OpenClaw article, but a critique of the hype. Too many content creators chase after OpenClaw for traffic without telling the truth. The reality is: for most people, there are better alternatives now.
And in the past week, the landscape has changed dramatically.
Insider Secrets Behind the Hype
Here’s the real experience of 90% of people using OpenClaw:
You see those viral tweets. You buy a Mac Mini. You install OpenClaw. You spend a weekend configuring proxies. You feel like a genius. About two days later. Then you realize you have no idea what to automate.
Your workflow gets interrupted. Your proxy setup encounters errors. You spend more time debugging than actually working. Now, you have a machine worth over $1,000, but it can only do tasks that a $20/month subscription service could handle.
I’ve seen this happen dozens of times in DMs (and with friends/employees). The problem isn’t the tool itself, but the approach.
But no one in the OpenClaw community seems to notice this.
While they’re busy debugging proxy configs, Anthropic, Notion, and other companies have released announcements that completely change the game.
Latest Announcements (and Why They Change Everything)
In recent weeks, a series of announcements have truly shifted perceptions about whether OpenClaw is suitable for most people. Here’s a breakdown:
Anthropic launched a mobile version of Claude Code called “Remote Control.” You can scan a QR code on your device to control Claude Code via iPhone or Android.
No need for Mac Mini, VPS, servers, or desktop terminals. Just send tasks from your phone, and Claude will build in the background.
One major advantage of OpenClaw is its accessibility via platforms like Telegram, WhatsApp, Discord — and the launch of Remote Control solves this for many users.
If Claude Code is aimed at developers, then Cowork is for everyone. It’s a GUI-based intelligent assistant capable of real work: not just answering questions, but executing multi-step tasks within your existing tools.
They recently added integrations with Slack, Figma, Canva, Box, and Clay. Plus, they launched plugins for finance, HR, design, and private equity sectors.
After Anthropic released finance plugins, a software sector ETF dropped 6% in a single day. On February 20, after Claude Code Security was released, cybersecurity stocks plummeted that afternoon.
This shows how much the market values this product.
For most people, tasks like research, document management, content workflows, and data analysis—Cowork already covers about 80% of what they need.
This feature has been underestimated, but it really shouldn’t be (especially for Notion users like me).
Notion rebuilt its entire AI system into autonomous agents. These aren’t chatbots; they can independently perform multi-step workflows over 20 minutes, with memory capabilities. They can connect to Slack, Google Drive, GitHub, and you can set execution times and triggers.
For knowledge work—project management, meeting prep, research, content planning, database management—Notion Agents outperform most OpenClaw setups, and the entry barrier is nearly zero.
If your main goal with OpenClaw is “manage my business and automate workflows,” then honestly, Notion Agents are a good starting point.
I won’t spend too much time on these tools now (more in-depth content coming later). But it’s clear: for basic automation like email scraping, web searches, SOP generation, lead enrichment—these tools can handle it.
If you haven’t fully utilized these tools, you probably don’t need to buy a Mac Mini.
Unmentioned Scalability Issues
OpenClaw community also overlooks a scalability problem.
Claude Code can scale infinitely in the cloud. More computing power, parallel tasks, better performance—it grows with your needs. OpenClaw runs on your hardware. When hardware hits its limits, your only option is to buy another Mac Mini.
And it’s not just about scalability. Claude Code integrates directly into GitHub, VS Code, and Xcode via MCP. They recently added features like security scans, lifecycle hooks, hot reload, and session switching across devices. This ecosystem expands weekly.
For most users, cloud-based tools are more practical.
OpenClaw’s Advantages
But OpenClaw still has unmatched advantages.
Complete local control. Your data never leaves your machine. Critical for handling sensitive business data, client info, or proprietary workflows.
Complex multi-agent orchestration. Running five interconnected, task-distributing, coordinated agents—something cloud tools currently can’t do. This is where OpenClaw truly outperforms all others (and why many still use it).
Custom agent features. SOUL files, detailed configs, agents that deeply understand your business background—such customization isn’t available elsewhere.
24/7 autonomous operation. Once set up properly, your agents can run around the clock without incurring subscription costs that eat into profits. Long-term, if you prepare well, OpenClaw can be more cost-effective.
True ownership. You own the entire tech stack, especially if you run local models.
If you’ve invested time building a suitable OpenClaw environment with real, validated use cases, you’re still in a strong position.
But given the ongoing industry updates, my personal view on OpenClaw is:
It’s a great tool, but not the only one. I use Claude Code for specific models/workflows. I use Notion Agents for business automation. I even use GPT for strategy.
In my opinion, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. The best approach is to use specific tools for specific purposes. OpenClaw is especially useful for data scraping automation and autonomous product iteration—but that’s a personal choice.
So, what should you do?
If you’re a beginner, here are my sincere recommendations:
First: Start with Claude (choose Cowork or Code based on your skill level). Get familiar with what AI agents can do in your specific workflow. I believe this is the best starting point for 99% of people.
Second: Add Notion Agents and/or Manus/n8n for your knowledge work and basic automation. Test what’s worth automating and what’s not. It’s a low-risk way to experiment with new workflows.
Third: When you find these tools aren’t enough, then turn to OpenClaw. Because now you know exactly what you need it to do.
Most people jump straight to step three and wonder why OpenClaw doesn’t work well.
Summary
OpenClaw is excellent for some, and if you want to stay at the forefront of AI, it’s definitely worth trying.
But hype has led people to believe that buying hardware and configuring proxies is the way to leverage AI. That’s not true. The right approach is to first identify which parts need automation, test with easy-to-use tools, and only upgrade to OpenClaw when necessary.
I still use OpenClaw daily and believe in it. But pretending it’s everyone’s starting point is misleading.
Start with the tools mentioned above, get comfortable, then build your machine.
That’s the right order. Most people get it backwards.
Related: Deep Dive into OpenClaw: Filtering Logic of 3,002 Community Skills and Ecosystem Overview