OpenSea former manager insider trading case reversal: Federal prosecutors announce postponement of indictment, case to be dismissed soon

GasFeeLady · 2026-01-23T05:00:11+00:00

The U.S. Department of Justice has decided to forgo a retrial of former OpenSea manager Nathaniel Chastain, and the case will be officially dismissed in one month. Chastain was charged with wire fraud for using his position to trade NFTs, but the court ruled that the relevant data did not constitute commercial value, which influenced the case's outcome. This decision reflects a shift in the U.S. stance on the legal classification of NFTs.

GasFeeLady

2026-01-23 05:00:11

Abstract generation in progress

【BlockBeats】The U.S. Department of Justice has recently decided to drop the re-trial of former OpenSea manager Nathaniel Chastain. The Manhattan Federal Court received notice from the prosecution on Wednesday that both parties have reached a stay of prosecution agreement, and the case will be officially dismissed in one month.

This case was once a landmark legal case in the NFT industry. Chastain was accused in 2023 of using his position to buy NFTs at low prices before they were featured on the OpenSea homepage, then profiting from the price increase by flipping them. However, a turning point occurred in July this year— the federal appeals court overturned the original verdict. The judge pointed out that the jury was given incorrect guidance, and more importantly, that the data on the OpenSea homepage itself does not constitute commercial value and does not meet the legal definition of property under federal wire fraud law. This ruling caused a stir throughout the Web3 community.

Prosecutor Jay Clayton stated that, considering Chastain has served three months in prison and has agreed to waive objections to the forfeiture of assets (involving 15.98 ETH, valued at approximately $47,330), the Department of Justice has decided not to pursue further prosecution. This decision marks the end of this highly watched NFT regulation case and also reflects a shift in the U.S. law enforcement’s attitude towards NFT legal definitions.

ETH0.13%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TeaTimeTrader

· 5h ago

Haha, Judge, your ruling is absolutely brilliant this time. I’m convinced by the argument that homepage data doesn’t count as property. --- Wait, does this mean the previous lawsuit logic was flawed? The industry really needs to reflect on this. --- OpenSea’s guy has turned things around, but this case will have a huge impact on future regulation. --- Honestly, this legal victory for Web3 is a good thing, but I’m worried the government will come up with new tricks again. --- So ultimately, it’s still the legal framework that’s lagging behind. Using the Federal Telecommunication Fraud Act to prosecute crypto cases is already a stretch.

View OriginalReply0

MissingSats

· 01-23 05:59

Huh? They're withdrawing now? I was still waiting to see the verdict... --- OpenSea homepage data doesn't count as property, that logic... Has the federal judge finally understood NFTs? --- Wow, such a big reversal. The original ruling was really absurd. --- So without a clear legal framework, anything can be accused... Luckily there's an appeal. --- This guy is quite lucky, but this case is more significant for the entire industry. --- Wait, does this mean that insider trading will be even harder to define on-chain in the future? --- Finally some common sense. Data ≠ Property, isn't that basic knowledge? --- Suspension of prosecution = de facto release, the US Department of Justice is scared. --- The judge's move has saved many Web3 people from being wrongfully accused. --- Fortunately, there's an appeals system; otherwise, wrongful convictions would be final.

View OriginalReply0

RugpullAlertOfficer

· 01-23 05:30

Haha, it's finally withdrawn. It should have been like this a long time ago. I was just laughing because the homepage data can be considered property. But to be honest, this move is a bit gray, it's just that the legal definitions haven't caught up. Web3 still needs to be gradually educated by the courts... Wait, did the prosecutor not finish speaking? The emergence of compliant winners

View OriginalReply0

FloorPriceWatcher

· 01-23 05:21

Huh? You're just pulling out now? The federal court's move is absolutely brilliant. --- Homepage data doesn't count as property... So what was I worried about before? Now clarity is here. --- Honestly, it's still that the law can't keep up with Web3. One set after another. --- Chastain is really lucky; a counter-appeal directly turns the tide... Learned a lesson. --- It should have been like this long ago. The charge of telecom fraud is too forced. --- So insider trading on the chain is considered reasonable now? Something's not right, everyone. --- The prosecutor giving up on re-trial... feels like they've admitted defeat, hahaha. --- This case has taught a lesson to future generations. The US legal system really needs to update its rules. --- The right to display on the homepage isn't even considered "property"... Then what is? The boundaries are really blurry. --- Sighing deeply, all those early NFT rulings need to be re-evaluated.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-23 05:20

Haha, now it's finally caught up—law definitions finally match Web3. The idea that homepage data isn't considered property is brilliant. --- Wait, does that mean insider trading is actually... not legally regulated at all? Feels like there will be more of this in the future. --- Chastain won, no doubt, but I just want to know what the prosecutors are thinking—why give up on a re-trial so quickly? --- Another legal victory for Web3. Honestly, these things should really be redefined. --- Homepage data isn't valuable... then what about my wallet address, haha? The law is still too outdated. --- Reversal, reversal, reversal—this story could be turned into a TV series. The NFT scene these past few years has really been complicated. --- Basically, the law hasn't kept up. The case with OpenSea is very significant as a precedent. --- If this ruling is cited immediately, it could be problematic. Looks like the follow-up will be very interesting.

View OriginalReply0

BetterLuckyThanSmart

· 01-23 05:05

Damn, another plot twist... After all this, does homepage data not count as property? How ridiculous is that legal definition? If you ask me, this is just the traditional legal system not keeping up with the pace of crypto. Now it's awkward, right? Oh my god, what is OpenSea's response now... I bet five bucks this guy will walk away unscathed in the end. Alright, Web3 1:0 Traditional Law, we win this round. Wait, does this mean that insider trading won't be an issue as long as you operate properly in the future? I can't quite follow this logic... It's pretty funny, took over two years to realize they didn't break the law. The US prosecutors' organization is also top-notch. This precedent has been set, there will definitely be a bunch of cases to re-examine later... Feels like the legal world is about to get chaotic.

View OriginalReply0

DataOnlooker

· 01-23 05:00

Huh? It's gone just like that? Feels like it just started. Once again, the legal bottom line in the NFT circle has become more blurred. OpenSea homepage data doesn't count as property... then what does? If I had known, I wouldn't have bothered with this circle now. People are always late to realize, only understanding the rules after the case law comes out.

View OriginalReply0