2026-01-20 06:38:23

Recently, in this round of market, it has been observed that some projects' performance within the BSC ecosystem is indeed worth paying attention to. $1 surged to 18M today. From a technical perspective, whether this upward trend can extend into a more sustained wave still depends on subsequent ecosystem activities and market participation.

Interestingly, some projects have solid fundamentals, but deviations in operational strategies have become obstacles. Especially those teams attempting to "follow the trend" by copying leading projects' routines—conflicting operations that try to maintain differentiation while rigidly syncing with others' gameplay—this sense of disconnection really makes the community uncomfortable.

Good tokens are important, but the key still lies in whether the team's operational rhythm and ecosystem narrative can work together to create synergy. Otherwise, even if there is a short-term surge, it can easily fall into a cycle of repeated fluctuations.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ApeWithNoChain

· 5h ago

What is the use of good coins? A team that drags everything down is pointless. Operational ability determines everything; no matter how good the technology is, it's useless. At the 18M level, it all depends on how the team tells the story next. Projects that copy by following trends are really disgusting. If you've chosen differentiation, don't waver. The community can feel the team's conflicting actions. Achieving this kind of division is already impressive. After a short-term surge, the subsequent trend is basically oscillation by fate, unless the ecosystem narrative can truly be self-consistent. It's easy to say, but projects that achieve synergy between ecosystem and operations are few and far between.

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 5h ago

It's already 18M, but I see this team still contradicting themselves. Whether they follow the trend or not, they'll still fail. I've seen many operations that try to have it both ways, and in the end, the community's morale collapses. What's the use of a good coin? Without a compelling story, it will still decline.

View OriginalReply0

RektHunter

· 5h ago

It's already 18M. Whether this wave can be held depends on whether the team truly understands operations. If the team is still caught up in internal conflicts, it will be disastrous. Even the best coin is useless. I've seen many cases where the fundamentals are solid, but the operations ruin everything... No matter how loud the hype, it ultimately comes down to what the ecosystem can actually do.

View OriginalReply0

SerumDegen

· 5h ago

lmaooo another "fundamentals are solid but execution sucks" case study... seen this movie 100x on bsc, always ends with copium holders and cascade liquidations when the narrative breaks. teams copying playbooks while pretending to be different? that's just asking to get rekt when sentiment flips ngl

Reply0