2026-01-20 02:35:46

Interestingly, the $AITown project team appears to be quite cautious in token distribution. According to on-chain data, there are no signs of obvious snipers or large holdings concentrated among insiders. The top holder, xbtDLN, maintains a relatively transparent presence.

From the bubble chart data, the token distribution is fairly dispersed, with no significant black holes of holdings. The CEX exchange wallet clusters account for 48.6%, which is the main source of liquidity. Specifically, a major exchange's wallet holds 18.4%, a compliant platform accounts for 11.5%, Mexc holds 2.9%, and other platforms are scattered. This distribution structure indicates that the project's liquidity is relatively healthy, and token flows between exchanges are fairly balanced, with no excessive concentration in a single exchange. For those interested in a deeper understanding of this project's tokenomics, these on-chain data are worth studying.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SocialFiQueen

· 13h ago

Hmm, AITown this time shows no obvious signs of a rug pull? On-chain data is quite transparent. Distribution is so scattered... 48% on exchanges, liquidity doesn't seem that bad. Wait, is xbtDLN really just an ordinary holder? This script doesn't seem right. Interesting, finally seeing a project that isn't dominated by a single entity.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 13h ago

On-chain data is so clean, it's quite rare to see This distribution really doesn't have the typical "cutting leeks" vibe Wait, 48.6% is held in exchanges... is there enough liquidity? But it’s still nice not to feel the presence of a whale concentrated on dumping I'm a bit interested in taking a deeper look at the economic model of this AITown

View OriginalReply0

Frontrunner

· 13h ago

Uh... 48.6% is held by exchanges. Is that called diversification? Am I seeing things? --- Wow, the project team is so transparent that I actually feel a bit uncomfortable. --- Who is xbtDLN? Check on the chain. --- No snipers? So the pump these days is... air? --- Liquidity health is a joke. CEX accounts for almost half, honestly, it still relies on exchanges to suck blood. --- Alright, since the data is transparent, I'll give a follow. It doesn't cost much anyway. --- This kind of analysis looks professional, but I'm more concerned about when I can sell.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiChef

· 13h ago

AITown's distribution looks pretty good, without the feeling of a monopoly, and the liquidity balance among exchanges is quite decent. Honestly, projects that don't have concentrated token holdings are quite rare; need to pay more attention to this xbtDLN. 48.6% CEX share indicates that the project team really understands liquidity, which is more conscientious than some projects. Wait, is this data real... You can verify it on-chain, but it seems the analysis is quite detailed. I need to dig deeper into the tokenomics; I always feel something's missing but can't quite put my finger on it.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTherapist

· 13h ago

Wow, looking at this distribution data, there really doesn't seem to be much shady activity. The liquidity being so dispersed is actually a bit surprising. There’s no obvious risk of market manipulation between exchanges, which is much more honest than I expected. But I still need to verify it myself; on-chain data, no matter how transparent, can't prevent a major whale scam. This is the kind of project where you should look at the tokenomics, much more reliable than those with extremely high concentration.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 13h ago

This distribution indeed shows no obvious signs of a rug pull, but having 48.6% held on exchanges is still a bit concerning. AITown didn't experience a large sell-off from big holders this time, which actually makes me a bit uncomfortable haha. People who look at on-chain data are truly serious players, thumbs up. The liquidity distribution is well done, unlike some projects that go all-in on a single exchange. Wait, is xbtDLN really transparent? I need to take another look at this. No snipers? Then this project is quite stable, just worried it hasn't attracted much attention in the early stages. Tokenomics really tests one's skills; studying on-chain data more is definitely the right move. This kind of distribution is quite balanced; now it depends on whether the later operations can keep up. Regulatory-compliant platforms account for 11.5%, it seems the project team is also working on compliance, good attention to detail. But healthy liquidity is one thing; whether it can truly rise depends on community enthusiasm.

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 14h ago

Uh, CEX占比快5成了啊，这流动性咋还叫健康呢… --- 没有狙击手？我怎么感觉这才是最可疑的地方 --- xbtDLN transparency is bullshit, only the newbies who can't understand on-chain data believe this set --- Diversify, diversify, but in the end, it's still the exchange that calls the shots --- Starting to talk about economics again, first ask if this coin can go up --- I laughed at the 48.6% CEX占比, is this called healthy? Wake up, brother --- Dare to ask how many people really understand these bubble charts, I’m at a loss anyway --- This data looks good, but I don’t know if it will crash tomorrow

View OriginalReply0