2026-01-20 01:32:18

Why have projects focused on privacy become more and more promising in the past two years, especially entities like DUSK?

To be honest, many public chains in the market are shouting about privacy, but most only stop at anonymous transactions at the transaction layer. DUSK is different—it integrates privacy from the very bottom layer of its architecture design, which determines how high its ceiling can be.

More importantly, this project does not shy away from the hot potato of regulation. Instead, it seeks to find a balance between privacy protection and compliance requirements. Think about it, the global tension over data security will only intensify, and in the future, projects that can both protect user privacy and avoid regulatory red lines will become essential.

This "privacy + compliance" combined approach is not some fancy concept. As more institutions and users begin to value privacy rights, only projects that can truly provide trustworthy solutions will have the chance to stand out. DUSK’s persistence and accumulation in this track indeed have considerable potential for the long term.

DUSK-0.95%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchroedingerGas

· 2h ago

Hmm... The combination of privacy + compliance is indeed rare, but I feel most projects will still be shut down by regulators.

View OriginalReply0

MysteriousZhang

· 2h ago

Privacy + compliance is indeed a rare combination, but whether DUSK can truly be implemented is the key.

View OriginalReply0

SerumDegen

· 2h ago

ngl the privacy+compliance angle is actually the real alpha here, most projects just cascade into liquidation trying one or the other

Reply0

GasDevourer

· 2h ago

Hmm... I've heard too many of these privacy + compliance arguments. The key question is, can they really be implemented? --- DUSK? Never heard of it. Is it just another small coin hype concept? --- Sounds good in theory, but will regulators really buy into it... That's a bit naive. --- I believe in the underlying architecture integrating privacy, but compliance is easier to talk about than do. --- This logic has some issues. Privacy and compliance are inherently opposed, after all. --- In the end, it all depends on how much it can increase in value; everything else is just talk, haha. --- A serious analysis post, but the market may not agree. --- It's just a gimmick. Let's see the actual product landing first. --- Privacy projects are piling up. Why should DUSK be able to stand out? --- Remember when ZEC was hyped like this? What’s it like now?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang

· 2h ago

This logic is actually quite good; privacy + compliance is indeed the real need within the false proposition. Few projects dare to touch the regulatory aspect, and DUSK's approach is quite good. Building privacy into the underlying architecture is much more reliable than patching it afterwards; I agree with this. However, I've heard quite a bit about long-term potential; let's wait for the data to speak.

View OriginalReply0