The current crypto market is undergoing a subtle shift — from a pure speculative frenzy to a competition focused on real yields. Institutional funds are pouring in continuously, and bringing real-world assets onto the blockchain has become an inevitable trend. However, when traditional finance embraces blockchain, it faces two major hurdles: compliance review and privacy protection. These are the tough bones that some project teams have been long struggling to chew.



Regarding the technical approach, Dusk has taken a different path. Unlike other general-purpose public chains, its foundational design revolves around regulated financial assets. Especially notable is the Piecrust VM virtual machine solution, which, based on zero-knowledge proofs, can both hide transaction details and mathematically prove to regulators that everything is legal and compliant. Ethereum and other mainstream public chains have yet to find a more elegant solution to balance these two aspects. No wonder institutional investors are particularly interested in such underlying infrastructure.

Looking at the token economy, DUSK is not just a tool for paying transaction fees within the ecosystem but also serves as the anchor for the entire network consensus. Through a segmented Byzantine consensus mechanism, token holders can directly participate in network governance, operate validation nodes, and share in the benefits of network growth. As RWA assets in the ecosystem continue to increase, the attractiveness of this economic model naturally rises as well.
DUSK4.85%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PerpetualLongervip
· 13h ago
Bro, this is the real infrastructure. The combination of zero-knowledge proofs and compliance is something I must hold onto and not move away from. This is what institutions are all bottom-fishing for.
View OriginalReply0
GasWranglervip
· 13h ago
ngl, piecrust vm's zk approach is technically superior to what eth's doing rn... but let's be real, the tokenomics angle here is sub-optimal if we actually analyze the data on node validator participation costs
Reply0
FloorSweepervip
· 13h ago
ngl, dusk actually cracked the compliance angle most builders can't even fathom... zero knowledge proofs doing the heavy lifting while institutions sleep easy? that's the real alpha leak right there. watching paper hands miss this entire accumulation phase is *chef's kiss*
Reply0
PanicSellervip
· 13h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed impressive, but will institutions really buy into it? --- Handling compliance and privacy simultaneously, this approach is truly unique. --- Piecrust VM sounds impressive, but how does it perform in real-world implementation? --- RWA on the chain is already a trend, and Dusk has identified the pain points. --- Token governance might once again become a game for big players. --- Circumventing regulatory hurdles is easy to talk about but hard to implement. --- Whether institutions enter the market or not ultimately depends on whether the ecosystem has genuine demand. --- With zero-knowledge proofs, isn't this about achieving both privacy and compliance?
View OriginalReply0
GasWastingMaximalistvip
· 13h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound good in theory, but how many can actually be implemented? If Dusk can truly solve the compliance + privacy dilemma, it's not surprising that institutions are scrambling to get involved.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)