A senior executive from a compliant platform recently spoke out publicly, raising questions about the new crypto legislation introduced by the Senate. He believes that this bill could be more stringent in practice than the existing regulatory framework—sounds quite ironic, but it is indeed a concern.



The original intention of this proposal is to clearly define the boundaries of authority between the SEC and CFTC in digital asset regulation, which is a good idea in itself. However, the executive pointed out several concerning aspects of the bill: on one hand, it could infringe on user privacy; on the other hand, it might undermine the reward mechanisms for stablecoins—both of which are significant issues for the entire ecosystem.

Currently, the reward mechanisms for stablecoins are a key way to attract users in the DeFi ecosystem. If these are restricted, it would effectively weaken the incentive layer of the entire on-chain economy. Privacy issues are even more sensitive—one of the main reasons crypto users choose this industry is their need for privacy. Therefore, for this bill to truly take effect, it needs further refinement.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)