The architecture here is cleaner. You get better transaction throughput, lower fees, and a more streamlined user experience compared to similar layer-1 alternatives. The design choices prioritize both scalability and efficiency—that's the real difference.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryervip
· 6h ago
A low-cost, efficient architecture design—that's exactly what I've been waiting for.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhangvip
· 6h ago
Wow, this architecture is really sleek, with maximum throughput and low costs, much more powerful than those layer-1s.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoHistoryClassvip
· 6h ago
ngl, "cleaner architecture" is what they said about solana in 2021... *checks notes* ...right before the network went down three times that summer. history doesn't repeat but it sure does rhyme, doesn't it?
Reply0
P2ENotWorkingvip
· 6h ago
It looks like another "we are more optimized" story, but let's see if it can really get off the ground...
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATMvip
· 6h ago
The combination of low cost and high efficiency is indeed excellent, but the reality is that most people simply cannot experience it.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlockvip
· 6h ago
This architecture is indeed comfortable, with maximum throughput and low costs. It far surpasses that bunch of layer-1s.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTearsvip
· 6h ago
Low fees sound good, but can it really take off?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)