Do you feel that this plan looks very familiar? It was only later that I realized it was just copied.



When conducting in-depth research with Gemini, be sure to pay attention to one thing—don't pile too much additional background information or prompt words into the Prompt. It's easy to lead the AI astray or generate results that seem déjà vu. The same applies to our crypto research; no matter how powerful the tools are, you need to know how to use them. Simple prompts often yield the best results.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
JustHodlItvip
· 6h ago
It's the same old story, AI-written content is all similar.
View OriginalReply0
GasWhisperervip
· 6h ago
ngl, the irony of warning about lazy prompting while half the crypto space just copy-pastes research is *chef's kiss*... seen this pattern way too many times in mempool data. clean inputs, cleaner outputs—simple as tracking gas waves during congestion spikes.
Reply0
PumpBeforeRugvip
· 6h ago
The stuff being copied can be seen at a glance, but some people really fall for this... It's true that keeping prompts concise is important; feeding too much junk information actually makes AI perform worse.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)