2026-01-11 08:41:18

Recently, the DEV project has been quite interesting. Normally, a market cap of $300,000 should be considered a niche presence, but surprisingly, someone has withdrawn over $100,000 from it in one go. Even more outrageous is that it's not just a single large purchase, but multiple wallets operating — it looks like someone is coordinating and planning.

This phenomenon is quite common in small-cap coins, but every time I see it, I still get a bit nervous. It could be that the project team and the funders are testing liquidity, or it could be that some big players are preparing for subsequent moves. A market cap of $300,000 is actually quite fragile, and such a volume of funds entering the market can have a very significant impact on price fluctuations.

Multi-wallet operations usually imply coordination behind the scenes, and don't seem like typical retail investor behavior. It’s important to keep an eye on the project's subsequent developments to see whether it is truly supported by fundamentals or just a short-term capital game.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

25 Likes

Reward
25
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseLandlord

· 01-14 07:14

Using multiple wallets to enter the market is a familiar tactic; still need to keep observing. Just rushing in isn't very meaningful; wait for a pullback. The market is so small that a little money can push it up, but be careful of getting cut. Betting on coordination orders is too risky, passing on that. Feels like another prelude to a new round of cutting leeks; better to see if there's any substantial development before entering.

View OriginalReply0

StableCoinKaren

· 01-14 05:28

Multiple wallet operations, I've seen this trick before, it's usually not a good sign --- 30,000 coins moved in with over 100,000? How desperate must they be --- It's the same coordinated buy pattern again, you need to keep an eye on wallet addresses --- Small caps are like this, a whale comes in and the price skyrockets, it's too fragile --- Honestly, it's all about fundamentals—if they don't exist, it's just a game of musical chairs --- Multiple wallet coordination clearly doesn't feel like retail investors, there must be a story behind it --- A market cap of 300,000 forcibly manipulated, how aggressive is this move --- It feels like DEV is just a capital game, where are the real fundamentals? --- This is standard operation for small-cap coins, I'm used to this routine --- Testing liquidity? To me, it looks more like market manipulation

View OriginalReply0

BlockBargainHunter

· 01-14 04:25

Multiple wallet entries, I've seen this move too many times, and it almost always leads to a sharp decline. --- Investing 100,000 in a 300,000 market cap? Isn't this just the usual pre-dump trick? --- Coordination and layout? Fundamentals? Ha, it's all nonsense, it just depends on who can run faster. --- Small-cap coins are like this; once the funds test the waters, they start to harvest. --- What are you watching for? This kind of market has been divided several rounds ago. --- I directly pass on multiple wallet operations; I can't play this game. --- It feels like someone is about to start harvesting the leeks, stay away.

View OriginalReply0

SingleForYears

· 01-12 01:12

Multiple wallets operating simultaneously, a real sense of internal coordination. This setup is too small to handle any fuss.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaWhisperer

· 01-11 09:10

Multiple wallets entering the market in this manner clearly indicates someone is causing trouble. It's too easy for small-cap assets to be manipulated, so be cautious. Throwing over 100,000 into a 300,000 position—are you trying to get yourself killed? Unless there's really something behind it. Retail investors wouldn't dare play like this; it must be internal coordination. I never touch this kind of project.

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 01-11 09:06

Such a small market cap, putting in over 100,000 directly crashes through it. A few wallets working together with actor-like performance.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPunster

· 01-11 09:00

Bro, this is a classic "leek buffet" scene—multiple wallets coordinating to buy in, basically laying out the red carpet for the next person to take over. Laughing as I lose everything on this one, it feels like DEV is a hotpot—whoever picks up their chopsticks first is the main dish. A market cap of $300,000,000 with this much capital injected—no explosion would be strange. Just wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

tx_pending_forever

· 01-11 08:46

Multiple wallets entering simultaneously, I've seen this trick many times... Eight or nine times out of ten, it's just to pump the price. Wait, is this DEV project really only worth 300,000? Then investing over 100,000 will just make it skyrocket, too risky. Better to run, small projects like this usually aren't good news. This is a typical game of funds, fundamentals? Ha. Just watch the show, I won't be touching it anyway.

View OriginalReply0

UncommonNPC

· 01-11 08:42

Multiple wallets entering? This market feels a bit fishy, be careful of getting chopped up.

View OriginalReply0