#代币分配与空投 Seeing ZAMA's Dutch auction design, I have to say that this mechanism has indeed been well thought out. No front-running, no bots, fair distribution—this creates a relatively fair participation environment for retail investors.

The key question is: with 10% of tokens released through this method, what will the subsequent distribution logic look like? My experience is that the token allocation structure often reveals the project's true attitude. If the initial public sale accounts for a reasonable proportion and the lock-up period is set appropriately, the selling pressure later on can be relatively manageable. Conversely, if the unlock schedule is unreasonable, even the best mechanisms are useless.

The time window is indeed tight, but I don't recommend blindly going all-in. Diversifying participation and deciding your investment scale based on your risk tolerance are fundamental principles. Some people like to chase hot gains from new projects, while others focus more on fundamental certainty. Both styles can be profitable; the key is to match your trading characteristics.

After the interaction ends, the focus should be on tracking the project's token release plan and market performance, as these are the critical factors determining whether sustained profits are possible. Lastly, the idea of "opportunity" can definitely catch attention, but approaching it rationally is more valuable than rushing in impulsively.