2025-12-24 14:10:40

#数字资产市场动态 The copy trading feature currently has an issue—once an option is selected, our account disappears. Is this design really correct?

Take a look at how mainstream exchanges handle this in the market. Their copy trading systems are more flexible, and user visibility is higher. On our side, we are actually restricted. To be honest, this is not a small matter—copy trading experience directly affects user retention.

If the platform wants to stand out in the competition, such details must be refined properly. Otherwise, even the best functional framework is useless.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

اميرةالعدنيه

· 4h ago

What is the reason?

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 5h ago

Account disappeared? That's too outrageous, who designed this? Copy trading users are directly discouraged; other exchanges have already fixed this. Neglecting these details can really cause serious problems.

View OriginalReply0

CodeAuditQueen

· 6h ago

Account disappeared? This is not a UI issue; it's a reentrancy vulnerability in state management. Is the on-chain data still there?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter

· 6h ago

Account disappeared? What kind of crazy design is this? There's no way to track progress at all.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 6h ago

The disappearance of accounts... is indeed a bit outrageous. Can copy trading be played like this? --- This design is really not good. Switching to two other exchanges is much more user-friendly. --- Again, this kind of "big feature framework" with poor details, really annoying. --- Once the account disappears, monitoring becomes impossible. Are you sure this is a feature and not a bug? --- Should copy trading systems be so frustrating? The exchange has already solved this problem, but we're still stuck here. --- In plain terms, it's just not well polished; you can't even use it if you want to.

View OriginalReply0