2025-12-24 14:01:34

Two years. That's all it took for Decagon to go from concept to powering customer service operations for over 100 companies. The founding team isn't new to the startup game—these are experienced builders taking another shot, and this time they're betting on AI agents.

The pitch sounds straightforward: automate customer service with intelligent agents instead of traditional chatbots. But here's where it gets interesting. In a market already crowded with well-funded competitors and enterprise incumbents flexing their resources, can a lean, hungry team actually carve out real territory?

The 100+ customer base suggests they're onto something. Real traction beats hype every time. Yet the question lingers—scaling aggressively while competitors have deeper pockets and established relationships isn't trivial. Growth momentum matters, but so does execution stamina.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiGrayling

· 4h ago

Getting 100+ clients in just two years, this pace is impressive... But to be honest, everyone is now competing in AI agents, and those with plenty of capital are also making moves. However, this team really has something, and with experienced players coming in again, it's a different level.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter_9000

· 4h ago

In two years, from zero to over 100 clients, the speed is undeniable. Experienced entrepreneurs are simply different. I believe AI agents replacing chatbots is promising, but how many will truly survive? The opponents with endless funds are watching closely. How long Decagon can hold out remains to be seen. Having over 100 clients using the product at least shows it's not garbage, but whether it can last until that day... is uncertain. With limited funds and few people, aiming for big achievements. Dreams are good, but reality will teach you a lesson.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9f682d4c

· 4h ago

Over two years, more than 100 clients—this speed is indeed impressive. But if you really want to compete with those big players who have raised multiple rounds of funding, relying solely on hunger might not be enough. --- The concept of AI agents is everywhere now; the key is whether they can truly retain customers. --- Experienced founders revisiting this matter know that at least the stakes are not so blindly set. But with such fierce market competition, only a few will persevere to the end. --- Having over 100 clients is not a small base, but the question is how to proceed with scaling later. The funding isn't deep enough, and the connections aren't as extensive as theirs. --- Ultimately, it still comes down to execution. Even the best ideas are useless if no one uses them.

View OriginalReply0

MEVictim

· 4h ago

Over two years, over 100 clients were acquired. The speed is indeed impressive. Nah, I’m not optimistic. Large companies’ funding crushes everything in minutes. The AI customer service track has been fiercely competitive for a long time. If it were that easy, so many people wouldn’t be losing money. Having a large team doesn’t necessarily mean victory; execution capability is the key. An experienced team is a plus, but the market is ruthless and unforgiving, brother. Over 100 clients sound like a lot, but how many actually survive?

View OriginalReply0

LonelyAnchorman

· 4h ago

Two years with over 100 clients, this speed is indeed impressive... but honestly, the real test has just begun. --- The AI Agent boom is a huge opportunity, with OpenAI and Google pouring money in. Why can Decagon survive? --- An experienced founding team + actual customer data are much stronger than those who only boast about fundraising. --- Can we overcome the funding gap... Sometimes having only execution ability is really not enough. --- Having hundreds of clients is not the point; the key is whether we can retain them. This is the harsh reality of ToB. --- Smartly shifting to AI agents, betting on the right trend makes you a hero; betting wrong makes you cannon fodder. --- Ultimately, it's a question: can we iterate faster than our competitors to develop more powerful products?

View OriginalReply0