Two different approaches in the DEX track—Lighter and Hyperliquid's business logic



Both deeply involved in the decentralized exchange field, Lighter and Hyperliquid have chosen completely different development strategies. Although both are engaged in DeFi, their underlying business structure designs are entirely different.

First, let's talk about Hyperliquid's approach—focused on horizontal scaling. Through mechanisms like Builder Codes, the priority is to grow the market and expand scale. The logic of this model is straightforward: build the market first, then consider optimization in other dimensions.

Lighter's approach, on the other hand, is different. Although both projects compete in the DEX track, their business entry points and expansion logic have fundamental differences. It's not about who has better technology or faster performance; the core difference lies in—how to understand and operate this business.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityWizardvip
· 8h ago
Start with the scale and then refine it; this move Hyper is playing is really slick.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 8h ago
It's not about the technology, it's about the business model of how to harvest the leeks, haha.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlivevip
· 8h ago
I'm not quite sure about the hype's focus on scale; it seems like just burning money to pile up users? The more refined approach like Lighter actually resonates more with me.
View OriginalReply0
LightningAllInHerovip
· 8h ago
Prioritize scaling first and then optimize? I think Hype just wants to quickly harvest, while Lighter is actually playing the long game.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)