In crypto circles, there's always debate about which projects deserve attention and resources.

Take Pippin, for instance. Some argue it's worth pushing—though the reasoning can be pretty vague.

Then you've got the established mega-hitters like 67, which commands massive cultural recognition globally.

So why wouldn't teams back the obvious winner? The calculus is surprisingly cynical: bringing in too many retail participants through a mainstream darling could fundamentally shift the space's composition. Not everyone in crypto wants mass adoption flooding their ecosystem with inexperienced actors. For some communities, maintaining exclusivity and control matters more than growing the user base. That's the real tension—innovation and accessibility versus gatekeeping and scarcity.