🎉 Share Your 2025 Year-End Summary & Win $10,000 Sharing Rewards!
Reflect on your year with Gate and share your report on Square for a chance to win $10,000!
👇 How to Join:
1️⃣ Click to check your Year-End Summary: https://www.gate.com/competition/your-year-in-review-2025
2️⃣ After viewing, share it on social media or Gate Square using the "Share" button
3️⃣ Invite friends to like, comment, and share. More interactions, higher chances of winning!
🎁 Generous Prizes:
1️⃣ Daily Lucky Winner: 1 winner per day gets $30 GT, a branded hoodie, and a Gate × Red Bull tumbler
2️⃣ Lucky Share Draw: 10
#BTC don't shorting
The market is likely to go up.
Yesterday, BTC did not break below 100300 even under extreme shorting pressure, and it formed a double bottom on the 1-hour level, with the bottom still rising. This indicates an upward trend.
Let's recall the basic situation of the past two days, first of all, the Fed's speech at 2 o'clock in the morning is basically the same old routine, no interest rate cuts, a bunch of nonsense, in this case no interest rate cuts, basically a big bearish, BTC can't fall, proving that the main force is strong to protect the disk, and the basic ones who run are retail investors. Coupled with the recent propaganda that there may be a risk of war, everyone's mood is very panicked, retail investors are selling a lot, but every time they reach a position around 103,000, they begin to rebound, if the main force and retail investors are selling, then the price has already fallen, why hasn't it fallen? It is clear that retail investors are selling, and the main force is buying. So, in my opinion, 103000 is a bottom. So the question arises, since the bottom, why has it been advertised at the bottom that there is a risk of war? I think this is more like a bookmaker trap, deliberately releasing a lot of bears in this position, allowing retail investors to chase in, and then pull the plate. In my opinion, it is not so easy for the United States to send troops, Trump is a businessman, and the consumption of troops is too large, which is not a good choice for the United States.
My suggestion is that if there is another opportunity to pull back to around 103000, you might consider positioning for a long position. Personally, I feel that it will go up.