#加密市场回调 LONG is a coin worth paying attention to recently.



Its tokenomics design is quite unique—the liquidity pool is locked in a black hole address, and all transaction fees don’t go to the team but are instead used directly for buybacks and burns or to supplement liquidity. In theory, this deflationary mechanism supports the price.

The team has been shaking out weak hands for nearly two years, so the token distribution should be relatively stable now. Historically, after a long period of sideways trading, there’s often significant volatility. The current price is 58.9U, and from both a technical and distribution perspective, it’s indeed in a relatively low range.

However, there is still risk during this market correction period, so I recommend managing your position sizes carefully. If you’re optimistic about this type of deflationary model project, allocating some at this level wouldn’t be considered chasing the top.
LONG-3.25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BlockchainFries
· 2025-11-27 21:54
I've seen this black hole lock bottom pool trap too many times; the real price support still relies on trading volume to speak.
View OriginalReply0
TheMemefather
· 2025-11-27 19:12
Whipsaw for two years, the chips are stable? This logic is a bit doubtful, who can guarantee it?
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 2025-11-25 02:08
I've seen the black hole burn mechanism too many times before. The key is still whether the team is reliable or not.
View OriginalReply0
StrawberryIce
· 2025-11-25 02:01
I've seen this trap of black hole destruction many times, but the key still depends on whether the team is reliable.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterKing
· 2025-11-25 01:53
I've seen plenty of projects use the "black hole burn" trick; the key is whether the team is actually following through. Two years of washing out holders is quite a long time, and I've heard the "token supply is stable" line plenty as well. If you're getting in now at 58.9U, you really need to set a stop-loss point—otherwise, you might end up with nothing again.
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusBot
· 2025-11-25 01:49
Whipsaw for two years, is the chip stable? I find this logic a bit questionable, and sideways is not necessarily a good thing.
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminal
· 2025-11-25 01:45
Black hole address locking the liquidity pool? Ha, I've heard that claim quite a few times, and the result is always the same...
View OriginalReply0
DAOdreamer
· 2025-11-25 01:43
The deflationary model sounds good, but what does two years of whipsaw indicate? The market maker hasn't dumped yet, right?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin